Archived tweet #11416 from the @leastfixedpoint Twitter Archive

@littledan @dan_abramov Rereading the proposal I see (1) is already in there, and isn't enough to *directly* represent the data I want to represent. But there's an indirect encoding I could use, and adding (2) and (3) gives me an *efficient* indirect encoding. So maybe 1+2+3 would be good, yes!